Handling Client's Moneys & Assets + Remuneration Disclosure *(Part I)*
Concept
The FAA sharply limits when a financial adviser (FA) or representative may hold or receive client money and assets — because personal custody creates a direct misappropriation risk — and it requires transparency about how the FA is paid. Two ideas run in parallel here: (1) don't touch client money except under tightly controlled conditions, and (2) disclose your remuneration clearly, in dollar terms.
Key rules & facts
- Legal basis: s.37 FAA empowers MAS to regulate or prohibit an FA receiving client money/property; the detail sits in the Financial Advisers Regulations (verify: section and regulation numbers).
- General restriction: a representative generally must not receive or deal with client money/property in the course of the regulated activity; any permitted receipt is tightly conditioned.
- Trust-account safeguard: where receipt is permitted, the money must be held on trust in a segregated designated account with proper records — protecting client money if the FA becomes insolvent (verify: trust-account regulation).
- Payment routing: premiums/investments should be paid directly to the product provider, or by instrument made out to the provider — not to the representative personally.
- Remuneration disclosure: disclose the basis of remuneration and benefits, and disclose fees/charges in dollar-and-cents, not merely as a percentage (verify: FAA-N03 and Practice Note FAA PN-01 references).
Handling client moneys — permitted vs prohibited
| Situation | Permitted? | Correct handling |
|---|---|---|
| Cheque made payable to the representative for a client's premium | No | Cheque must be payable to the product provider; refuse personal receipt |
| Cash handed over to hold "to help" the client | No (general rule) | Direct client to pay the provider; representative should not hold funds |
| Receipt permitted under FAR conditions | Yes, conditionally | Hold on trust in a segregated designated account with full records |
| Disclosing fee only as a percentage | Insufficient | Disclose in dollar-and-cents plus the basis of remuneration |
Worked example
A client hands the representative a cash cheque made payable to the representative himself to settle a premium. Not permissible — payment should go to the product provider, and the representative must not personally receive or hold the client's money.
Exam angle
Situational — "a representative accepts a cheque payable to himself for a client's premium — permissible?" (No.) Or "is a percentage-only fee disclosure sufficient?" (No — dollar-and-cents.)
⚠ The trap
Thinking a percentage fee disclosure suffices — the standard is dollar-and-cents; and assuming a representative may personally hold client funds "to help." Even trust-accounting is only for the narrow permitted cases, not a general licence to hold money.
Takeaway
Don't hold the client's money (and where permitted, trust-account it in a segregated account) — and show your pay in dollars and cents.
Ready to test yourself on this?
Practise exam-style questions with the answer, explanation and the trap on every one.
Practise RES5 questions →